Shocking Facts On The Child Support System Exposed By Breakthrough Study

Divorce Corp Director, Joseph Sorge, interviews renowned economist and lead author of a breakthrough study on the costs of raising a child, Professor William …


Your reaction?
Angry Angry
Cute Cute
Fail Fail
Geeky Geeky
Lol Lol
Love Love
Win Win

Shocking Facts On The Child Support System Exposed By Breakthrough Study

Comments 41

  1. California has no place making or studying anything ! This whole breeding shithole state can not budget its Toilette paper for the people they take in for fans or voters who shit on the streets. Who cares what they think? Actions show plenty.

  2. Hold people responsible for fornicating..The court system should stay out of Peoples personal decisions. They either planned or they did not . Tax payers should not Pay for peoples mistakes. Let churches and these people grow up to learn their lesson..Dont grant divorce….? vows should be just that. people will learn to be accountable.


  4. When I got divorced I suggested to my ex that we divide everything 50/50 as is the law in my zionist jew controlled Western toilet of a country and share custody and NOT involve lawyers. She went straight to an obese, ugly jew lawyer who told her if we shared custody she would receive no child support, so the lies about me being a terrible father and of course lengthy legal battle ensued.

    I had to hire a lawyer and actually found a decent (no jew of course) one, who told me that the mother always gets custody and that I should not fight as to save my half of my assets for my children. My ex not only received my half of the assets (all mine) but I receive half of her credit card debts and found out that she could take half the money I had invested for our children's' education as the government considers it an asset – so of course she cashed it in for herself.

    So her jew lawyer ended up with over $150 000 dollars so undoubtedly her jew offspring could go to law school and become lawyers and judges (mine was of course a jew also) and my children ended up with an abusive mother who was given sole custody.

    I traded in my fat lazy Caucasian ex for a slim, beautiful, hard working and educated Chinese woman and had new beautiful children. Plus I got to stay home more to raise our children as my wife owns several businesses, so my income dropped significantly and the human (non jew) judge ruled I had to thus pay much less child support. My ex then had to get off her obese ass for the first time in well over a decade and go back to work – and it's killing her.

    God will give my children justice they were denied from the jew courts and the jew will end up with their lord, the devil. #BDS

  5. His methodology proves exactly what I have said for years. The real cost of supporting children has never been properly studied until now. My child support days are over, but it came at great cost. Why a court would take away my children, my house, my money and my retirement security, simply to placate an undeserving woman is criminal!

  6. A man makes a deposit with his penis, shooting out the white stuff which is sperm, 9 months later a baby is born both parties don't want to be together the women's vagina makes the withdrawal from the man's bank account in form of the baby he impregnated her with damn, the human species in modern America is a mean system , so fellas if you are going swimming have on a life jacket, if not you will drown and your finances as well lol! Or you better pull out early.

  7. Women need to be aware of this issue since they blindly subject their mates to the system without due process violating their individual rights. What a shame! Whatt has happened to women? This is definitely not a matter for the courts to settle but a personal and private matter. Let's have some class!

  8. Now the tables are turning for the feminazi scum.

    The Arabic gang-rape 'Taharrush' phenomenon which sees women surrounded by groups of men in crowds and sexually assaulted… and has now spread to Europe

    Women exposing their body are harrasing men and shuold be punished.

    Oslo Professor of Anthropology Dr. Unni Wikan’s solution for the high incidence of Muslims raping Norwegian women is not for the rapists to be punished, but for Norwegian women to “take their share of responsibility” for the rapes because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative.

    Norwegian women, she has counseled, “must realize that we live in a Multicultural society and adapt themselves to it.”

    Cologne Mayor Henriette Reker’s response to the assaults under her watch [when 1,ooo German women were sexually molested and raped by Muslim migrants] has been to reprimand the victims, suggesting that they had asked for it.

    She has vowed to make sure that women will change their behavior, so that they don’t provoke Muslims to sexually assault them again.

    There will now be published “online guidelines” for women to read so they can prepare themselves….

    If a woman dresses in “sexy” clothes and goes out in public, why shouldn’t we consider this a form of sexual harassment in its own right?

    From an Islamic perspective, the harm caused to individuals by this is clear and inarguable. Think of men or adolescent males who for whatever reason cannot find a sexual partner. Or think of married men being endlessly tempted by strangers as soon as they step out of the house.

    Now you western female predators are going to pay for the crimes commited against our grandfathers, fathers, and brothers. Western women are a clear example of toxic femininity.

    Feminists (aka western women) will be on their own, no more preferential treatment for women, Christianity place women on pedestals ; and gives them the virtues held by the ideal female role model – the Virgin Mary.

    Other cultures see women in a different light , as treasonous creatures, manipulative, egoistical, and unworthy of respect if they do not earn it first.

    Are wester men going to help feminist women, their oppressors?

    Nobody Helped Woman Raped by 20 Muslim Migrants

    A rape case so brutal that even the Swedish main stream media is reporting about it.

    “Eeew, you have sperm on your face and on your clothes, don’t involve us,” they said to the woman. She had just endured a gang rape and abuse by up to twenty perpetrators in a stairwell in Fittja, but nobody in the southern Stockholm suburb wanted to help the victim, Metro reports.

    More details are now being published about the high profile case in Fittja, which took place in a stairwell in August 2016. The woman was gang-raped and also beaten up by up to twenty perpetrators. The woman was kicked, beaten, threatened with a knife and her head was knocked against the floor until she went unconscious.

    A neighbor who witnessed the brutal attack chose to ignore the it. He later stated to the police that he has “learned not to see or hear too much.” The man has lived for 15 years in Fittja, a Muslim-dominated area.

    Seeking help after the rape, the woman rang the doorbell of one apartment to ask for assistance to call the police. But the man who opened the door ignored her appeal and turned the bloody victim soaked in the rapists’ bodily fluids away.

    The woman then managed to get to the Fittja city center to seek help but there she was told she was “disgusting.” Nobody wanted to help her. “A guy told her she was disgusting and she had sperm in her hair,” reads the police report. She also tried to get help from a guard at the train station, but also he didn’t care about the woman’s situation.

    Instead, the woman was forced to take the subway to central Stockholm in order to seek help. Several men are now charged with the crime. According to the prosecution, they also filmed the rape and laughed during their sexual abuse.

  9. 95% of the people married ten years ago are divorced.

    Usually people talk about a 50% divorce rate, is a dangerous lie, it takes in account men married in the 60´s and the 70´s , the relevant data is that 95% of the people married ten years ago are divorced.

    National Survey of Family Growth:

    The 50% is EXTREMELY deceptive number.

    So men that marry and have children under the christian/feminazy sharia law, know they will be sent to the slaves market (family court) were women steal their children, throw them to the streets from their own homes like dogs and steal their assets, after that they exploit them as slave labor, (child suppor/alimony), and routinely torture them caging them as animals to make sure they remain submissive slaves.

    Some of them can not cope with those atrocities and kill themselves, others not brave enough kill themselves slowly with alcohol and drugs.

  10. The christian (feminist) slavery based matriarchies of the west have their days numbered.

    Now we're in a situation where we don't even come close to replacing our population.

    70% of American men ages 20-34 aren't married and women lose 90% of their ovarian eggs by the age of 30.

    One generation more and the repugnant parasitical matriarchy will be gone.

    Western men must choses between Cristianofeminist Sharia law or Islamic Sharia Law …………………………… a no brainer!!!

    The Archbishop of Canterbury says Sharia law in the UK "seems unavoidable".

    The Archbishop of Canterbury says the adoption of certain aspects of Sharia lawin the UK "seems unavoidable".

    Men in the west have less rights than blacks in the south african Apartheid.

    The west is rotten beyond believe, they have criminalized fatherhood, men do not marry, birth rates have plummeted, and will do more, just the idea of becoming a father under the feminazy regime is disgusting.


    Men are pigs, rape culture, oprressors, ………. it's not a problem for us guys to convert, I feel bad for women or jewish citizens of Europe though as this noose is closing around their neck in the long run.

    Revolutions often result from bad law. For many who suffer under injustice, Islam is an attractive alternative to an oppressive regime. In fact, the corruption and abuse of justice in Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier Province is one of the biggest reasons for locals’ support of the Taliban, who promise to return righteous rule to the region with their strict version of Sharia.

    Many British people who are turning to Sharia are men, and some British “conservatives” fear that there will be large numbers of conversions to Islam by married British men who fear the potential devastation of a secular, civil divorce.

    MP Mark Pritchard, member of the Conservative Party Human Rights Commission, writes:

    Women are also losing out in rulings over child custody disputes, which more often rule in favour of men. It is not unimaginable, in the near future, people from other faiths – and no faith at all – will nominally or genuinely convert to Islam, that in the hope of begetting a sympathetic custody hearing and paternal settlement compared to the maternal bias of some English family courts.

    Although a severe understatement, at least Mr. Pritchard is honest about the “maternal bias” in the Anglosphere’s secular family law. A host of other so-called conservatives raise the specter of abuse of women being sanctioned by Sharia (abuse of men by secular family law appears unimportant to them):

    Just like the preacher who rails against men in his Sunday sermon only to find that they are soon absent from the pews – indeed, absent from any church at all – the conservatives will soon find themselves and their feminist allies of convenience all alone in their counter-jihad.

    If the abuse of men by family law, which provides women with incentives to leave their husbands and attack them with government agencies, is not addressed by these conservatives they will simply be abandoned by their base of traditional British men, and they will have deserved it. The Church of England, once a bastion of British respectability and national character, is a faint shadow of its former self. Confronted by a more vigorous and manly faith, even the Archbishop of Canterbury is now endorsing Sharia.

    Although I do not support Sharia in the West, because I think it is a poor fit for Western culture, environment and civilization, it would be disingenuous of me to write that it does not offer an attractive alternative to contemporary family law. If the West cannot address its own broken law and the millions of injustices it has brought down on its men, we may soon face the specter of a home-grown Taliban, and if the only people fighting it with all their hearts are Feminists and opportunistic Social Conservatives, there’s a good chance it will eventually win.

  11. Racism did not truly end with the rise of feminism. Black males bear the brunt of feminist policy. When boys do not grow up expecting to be fathers and husbands, how can black Americans succeed? Black males, as a group, are the most likely to end up in prison or dead at an early age. The ejection of black men from the own communities is the primary reason they are so easy to recruit into radical masculist Muslim activism. Meanwhile, black females are provided massive social and educational supports along with preferential treatment getting “apron ready” jobs they are often unqualified for.

    Welfare is an entitlement for women and a sentence to indentured servitude for men funded by governmental socioeconomic destruction of marriage – especially in the lower classes. Today, one-third of children are raised by unmarried mothers supported with our tax dollars.

    Child support is then forcefully collected from low-income men (who must support themselves, too). From a policy perspective, it is madness to destroy marriage with welfare state “income guarantees” that are also recoupments, expecting the poor to lift the poor out of poverty. Most of these children lack necessary parental and economic resources that cannot be effectively replaced by government. We spend 30 times more per-capita on welfare than China does and wonder why so many children are failing in school.

    Congress has been unable to balance the budget – so it raises the debt ceiling another notch every few months. Indeed, as much as 70% of poverty would be erased if fathers and mothers simply married – a policy direction professional feminists discount as meaningless.

  12. Today’s rabid feminism actually has its roots in Puritanism

    Puritans being those reformed Christians who sought to “purify” the Church of England of its Catholic practices by resettling on a new continent.

    For Victorian and Progressive reformers around the turn of the twentieth century, the only thing worse than an American male was an immigrant male.

    A working-class, immigrant Catholic male was perhaps the worst of all. These people were — to use a word recently given new meaning — the "deplorables" of American society 100 years ago. Men have been blamed for most of society's ills.

    It seems that "toxic masculinity" is not a feminist thing.

    Among Victorians in the late nineteenth century, and among the later Progressives in the twentieth century, men were singled out as the primary cause of a multitude of social ills ranging from child abuse to poverty. A chief factor in of all these threats to civilization was alcoholism.

    The fact that only some men caused such misfortune for their families was not necessarily emphasized. Though seldom ordained as religious leaders, moreover, women set the agenda also at church. They took their morality into public space with various reform movements, continuing crusades (which had begun with abolitionists in the North) against the evils that they associated with men: prostitution, intemperance, and secularism. Moreover, they were demanding more influence in all spheres of public life.

    At least partly on the cases of their own self-proclaimed moral and spiritual superiority to men… they demanded the right to vote, the prohibition of "demon rum," and many other changes… In her appropriately titled book The Feminization of American Culture Ann Douglas examines these trends. In many cases, the goal was to "civilize" men through what the reformers' opponents might have described as excessive "domestication."

    Thus, for many of the prohibitionists, the abolition of alcohol was not a matter of blandly taking away a threat to public health. Prohibition offered an important step in keeping men at home, out of the saloons, and away from many of their vices.

    This institutional framework was especially troubling since it confirmed male Catholics, immigrants, and other undesirables in their ways, thus making them less likely to be converted into the ranks of the Progressives and other reformers. In 1920, a female Party official at the GOP convention that year felt the need to clarify that "I most emphatically do not believe in the aggressive, antagonistic, anti-man spirit in politics."

    At the time, the Republican party was the home of the most aggressive reformers, and many party officials felt the need to separate themselves from these activists, just as some Democratic Party officials today must announce that they don't support Antifa.

    The interviewer, a writer for Good Housekeeping, informs the reader that by 1920 "the anti-man period of the woman movement is past. The day of sex-antagonism is past." The article, which apparently takes an anti-reformist position, may have drifted into some wishful thinking.

    Indeed, in her updated 1998 preface to The Feminization of American Culture, Douglas suspects that "Amid faux-feminist standards of sexual impropriety, proliferating lawsuits, and a tyrannical pop psychology of victimology, we are now conducting a series of cultural campaigns remarkably like the drives for Purity and Prohibition in which the reform impulses of my [Victorian] subjects culminated in the late nineteenth century."

  13. The women of the Klan gave life to the Woman’s Rights Movement.

    Racism focused on black males, but feminism targets all males.

    The root ideologies and slogans of feminism as we know it today were drafted by members of the Women’s Ku Klux Klan (WKKK) beginning in the 1880s. This is documented by Kathleen L. Blee in her book “Women of the Klan.”

    Below is a brief synopsis of what is proven in “Women of the Klan.”

    The WKKK played a controlling role in the KKK. Early feminists in the WKKK demanded great power in the Klan, applying powerful sexual imagery to get it. Women were placed on a pedestal of motherly sexual purity requiring knee-jerk protection from black men. WKKK activists quickly discovered that the power of sexual victimization was just as effective against white men, too.

    In the late 1880s, a broadside was published by the Evansville, Indiana, WKKK chapter proclaiming; “No longer will man say that in the hand of woman rests the necessity of rocking a cradle only. She has within her hand the power to rule the world.” This and other early radical feminist mottoes reappeared in the suffragette movement and the 1960s as a core agenda of the “great society” and sexual liberation revolutions.

    The WKKK established many memes and institutions still central to contemporary feminism. Motherhood was drudgery. The YWCA was established to offload child care. Abortion of black babies was urged in cohort with Margaret Sanger.

    Women exercised sexual power fluently. The movie “Rosewood” documents a white woman claiming rape by a black man to cover up for an affair she was having, resulting in a massacre of blacks in the town of Rosewood, Florida. The KKK was also America’s first child-support collection agency and a prototype for our one-eyed Title IV-D system.

    Elizabeth Tyler, the first WKKK grand chief of staff, seized control of the KKK, removing Grand Dragon Simmons by accusing him of sexual improprieties. She replaced him with her paramour whom she controlled along with the membership of the Klan. By 1925, the WKKK had about 4 million members – a very large organization in those days.

    One reviewer of Kathleen Blees’ book wrote, “The significance of ‘Women of the Klan’ rests not in its somewhat ebullient celebration of feminist principles, but rather, that it documents in great detail a direct lineage between the Women’s Ku Klux Klan and the radical feminist movement as it exists today. The book draws from a wide variety of historical documents, letters, and in-camera interviews that the author recorded with older women who were still alive at the time the book was written.”

    Contemporary feminism still functions on the same visceral sexual-political mechanics as the WKKK. By the 1960s, the feminist machine was now armed with Freudian victim psychology and Kinsey’s sexual liberation agenda, expounded by degreed professional feminists (“women’s studies” majors).

    Old Frankfurt school Marxism previously ineffective in America was retargeted by Herbert Marcuse, who theorized that contented middle-class America could be divided and destroyed by a youthful sexual revolution. The rise of Saul Alinsky’s New Marxist movement created a generation of politically powerful young Americans bent on destroying their own country.

    The KKK collapsed about the same time radical feminism rose to prominence because feminists re-pointed their agenda at all men, not just black men. They demanded equality, destruction of “the Patriarchy,” evisceration of religion and special protections for “liberated” women.

    The only difference between racism and contemporary sexism is the target of social and economic repression. Racism focused on black males, but feminism targets all males.

    Racism did not truly end with the rise of feminism. Black males bear the brunt of feminist policy. When boys do not grow up expecting to be fathers and husbands, how can black Americans succeed? Black males, as a group, are the most likely to end up in prison or dead at an early age. The ejection of black men from the own communities is the primary reason they are so easy to recruit into radical masculist Muslim activism.

    Meanwhile, black females are provided massive social and educational supports along with preferential treatment getting “apron ready” jobs they are often unqualified for. Welfare is an entitlement for women and a sentence to indentured servitude for men funded by governmental socioeconomic destruction of marriage – especially in the lower classes.

    Today, one-third of children are raised by unmarried mothers supported with our tax dollars. Child support is then forcefully collected from low-income men (who must support themselves, too). From a policy perspective, it is madness to destroy marriage with welfare state “income guarantees” that are also recoupments, expecting the poor to lift the poor out of poverty.

    Most of these children lack necessary parental and economic resources that cannot be effectively replaced by government. We spend 30 times more per-capita on welfare than China does and wonder why so many children are failing in school. Congress has been unable to balance the budget – so it raises the debt ceiling another notch every few months.

    Indeed, as much as 70% of poverty would be erased if fathers and mothers simply married – a policy direction professional feminists discount as meaningless.

    Feminist policy has left more women barefoot, pregnant and in poverty than any other event in American history. It is time we hold feminists squarely responsible for it – which Phyllis Schlafly accomplished in her new book “Who Killed the American Family?” In this short column, Dr. Gina Loudon proves the “eight important benefits of marriage, controverting nearly the entirety of the feminist agenda.

    There is scant evidence feminism impacted public policy positively. Feminists have little girls dressed up as sexy princesses using filthy language. At age 24, there are 148 women with college degrees for every 100 men. The “gender pay gap” is a reflection of women’s choices. Rape rates have declined significantly since 1973 – long before feminist policy kicked in. Women now commit at least half of all serious domestic violence. Widely disseminated feminist myths about domestic violence have been thoroughly debunked. A crisis of child sex abuse in schools is perpetrated by female teachers, who rarely go to prison, and nobody is doing anything about it.

    The feminist power agenda has caused serious problems on college campuses. California just enacted “Yes Means Yes,” a widely criticized law converting college life into a witch hunt for a non-existent campus rape “crisis.” This law was thoroughly eviscerated by feminists Camille Paglia in Time magazine, Margaret Wente in the United Kingdom, professor Alan Dershowitz, and challenged by at least 30 men suing colleges for discriminatory dismissal.

    The feminist movement is falling out of favor in public. Many young Americans see that feminism is a cult and reject it on its face. Voters are learning that feminism is the movement driving liberalism, socialism, taxes, deficits, dystopian government, and our nation’s greatest social and criminal problems. Even in massively liberal Portland, Oregon, feminism is on the skids. The feminist bookstore featured in the TV show “Portlandia” is going out of business for lack of paying customers.

    Unfortunately, professional feminists have firm control of government, law schools, universities and media – forcing their agenda on the rest of us. We must strive for more balance in perches of power. Title IX holds the keys to end the reign of radical feminist sexism. We must establish new, sensible supply-side socioeconomic policy focusing on rebuilding the marriage culture and a pro-social God-loving country.

  14. "False Accusations in Spain"

    Only a retard can think nowadays that feminism is about equality.

    Feminism has created a dictatorship, destroyed civil rights and due process, equality under the law and presumtion of innocence, like in rape acusations and domestic violence laws, created dozens of new crimes (sexual harassment, offenses to women, DNA testing your own kid in Britain, afirmative consent, etc).

    The atrocities of the reversed burden of proof in criminal cases against men, the spanish nazi courts with their offender based laws.

    The modern legal system is set to transfer financial resources from men to women. It is stacked against men, in that most accusations of rape, sexual abuse, sexual harassment can instantly ruin a man who, by law, is presumed guilty unless proven innocent.

    Feminists manipulative control of the legal and family court system created a monster that subjugates men. Men are a bunch of lambs that obediently go to slaughter. Like the Jews went to the gas chamber. But it is worse then the Jews in WW II. There is no country persecuted men can flee to and get asylum. Oppressed exploited wage enslaved men are not recognized as persecuted refugees.

    Such men can either suffer the rest of their lives in poverty, in the Gulag jail of feminist dictatorship. Or they can act like men and fight back. Men are repressed cradle to grave. In kindergarten and primary school, boys fall behind because female-only teaching staff gears school towards girl’s preferences and punishes boys for being boys. Female indoctrination continues through University, where a terror regime of sexual harassment laws stifles academic freedom and research.

    Feminism successfully destroyed the basis of every society, the core family, they have shamed and forced men into obedience and made masculinity a crime… Not exactly the very best preconditions to fight… let's say an aggressive religious ideology that sees men as the pinnacle of evolution, treats women like cattle and whose followers breed like rabbits.

    Movements like Men Going Their Own Way have arisen because Western Society seems to have no structure left and EVERYONE is going his or her own way. Men in this movement are just following the tide.

    I have ZERO desire to protect women from radical Islam. Think about it. What am I defending? No fault divorce? Transexualizing of children? Abortion on demand? "Democratic tyranny"? Sorry, I don't feel motivated to maintain the factory that builds my chains.

    Since women are capable of standing by and watching men get ravaged by divorce courts, crap wars, suicide rates, double standards, Title 9, and 50 years of cultural bashing, I am capable of standing by and watching women and their cohorts in leftism the LGBT get stoned to death or thrown off buildings.

    They hate me? Well, I hate them. Heck, all I have to do is trade in the AR for an AK, grow a beard, and convert. And women? They get to wear a sack. Big deal – they can still get to be wives and mothers, albeit for a guy with a beard and a little darker. Those who don't, well, I'll give as much of a fuck for them as they give for me. Their cries for mercy will be heard like my cries for equal justice under the law, for reason, for fairness, and for respect.

    I support nothing in the West, and I defend nothing in the West, as it slides into the dark abyss. For all the shit and garbage that Men have had to put up with in the last 50 years, with me the final straw was when white women in Canada are now being groomed to accept the hajib and niqab as a fashion accessory because they KNOW it will eventually be forced upon them by the soon-to-be majority muslims in our country.

  15. Lets be honest the root of this cancer is in the Judeo Christian values.

    Judeo as ……….. Israel.

    No Woman, No Crime: Israeli Men, legally harassed by women

    The west are criminal matriarchys nothing more, but the level of oppression has increased to intolerable limits.

    The pain of Europe’s economic crisis is being felt sharply by a new class of people:

    Separated and divorced men who end up impoverished or on the streets as they struggle to maintain themselves while keeping up child support and alimony payments. Stories about divorced Italian young fathers sleeping on the streets or in their cars is not exactly a strong advertising for fatherhood.”

    Men see this and are turned off from pursuing becoming a father, Women see this and can’t find a suitable mate. No one gives a damn after this.

    You will cry after watching this video !

    And the west is dying, in fact is already dead.

    Western Civilizations Will Go Extinct

    Demographic Winter:

    Then there is a growing perception that this collapse is not cyclical but secular. Increasingly, young Europeans are deciding not to start families—the key to future growth—in reaction to the recession.

    Even in once-rigidly Catholic Spain, marriage and fertility rates have been falling for decades, and family structure weakening. Spaniards are having fewer children now than they did during the brutal civil war of the late 1930s. Alejandro Macarrón Larumbe, a Madrid-based management consultant, in his 2011 book, El Suicidio Demográfico de España, points out that the actual number of Spanish newborns has declined to an 18th-century level.

    Spain, long concerned about its ageing population and emptying countryside, has passed a milestone in population decline, recording more deaths than births in the first half of this year.

    Deaths exceeded births by more than 19,000 in the first half of 2015, a turnaround from a year earlier when there were nearly 4,000 more births than deaths, the National Statistics Institute (INE) said.

    Deaths outnumber births in Spain

    Spain has not consistently experienced more deaths than births since its 1936-39 civil war or the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, according to news reports. Deaths briefly exceeded births in early 1999, but demographers considered that a blip, while now they see it as the start of a longer trend.

    The west criminalized divorce for men, in an era were divorce is a certainty, the penalty is paramount of a death sentence proved but the fact tht many men prefer to kill themselves, by doing so, they have the facto criminalized Marriage and family, that was the beguining of the collapse, and instead of correcting this they have worsen everything with feminism.

    Judeo christian values aka feminism, is the cancer that kills entire countries.

  16. There has been a deep decline in marriage rates over the past several decades, that perfectly aligns with the implementation of Chritiano/feminist divorce.

    MULTICULTURALISM is the desperate atempt to the elites to avoid extintion, they know is to late to reform the putrid west, the criminal western matriarchies are two generations away of total extermination, so they are importing people with family oriented values, patriarchal values, protect them islamophobia, juedochristian (feminist) family courts for the natives, pro fatherhood , pro family laws for them Sharia law now is enforced in almost all western countries.

    Multiculture is how is called the intermediate phase of ethnocides, were one culture is erased and subsitituted by another one.

    Multiculture is never permanent.

    Monoculture is the final stage in this case ISLAM.

    Afganistan were Budists, multiculture, now 99% muslim, monoculture.

  17. Spain’s New Sex Czar

    The birthrate in countries that pander to feminism and misandry (man-hating) are, without exception, showing huge declines in their birthrates and net population increases.

    Spain, Denmark, Germany, France and the UK are all panicking because their fertility rates are so low, that their indigenous populations will be extinct within a century. In addition, all of those countries have huge social obligations to aging populations, and, those obligations are coming due as there are not enough young people to pay into socialist systems for the care of their elders.

    One of the ways that the elite, in Western European countries (and the US) are trying to see if it will improve the declining populations, is to have open borders so that men will come from North African countries (mostly) to have sex with Western European women.

    Feminism, in Western European countries, has been unchallenged for over 60 years, and, is now de rigeur in all institutions, especially Europe’s public indoctrination (education) system. Hatred of men, and masculinity, in Western European nations, is open and oppressive to men. It is one of the factors driving the gender suicide gap world-wide (in which men are committing suicide at 4 times the rate of women). It is also the principal reason behind the decline in birth rates, and, the net population decreases.

    Spain’s approach has been to appoint a “sex czar” to encourage Spanish men to have sex with Spanish women.

    The problem is that Spain hates men, so much, that virtually every aspect of Spain’s institutions, its economy, its politics and its social interaction between men and women is now so toxic for men that only men with nothing to lose can afford to have sex with Spanish women.

    Let’s take an example. If a woman who is spiteful in Spain (a large number of women fall in this category) all she has to do is accuse a man of sexual misconduct, or “domestic violence” and he is thrown in prison. No questions asked. If he can prove he is innocent, he might get out.

    If he can’t, he’s branded a rapist, or a wife-beater, and, the rest of his life is ruined. Whether the accusations against him are true or false, the Government immediately pays the woman for making the accusations (at the rate of 400 euros per month). This scheme is reminiscent of the fascism of Franco’s rule when, in 1944, he enacted laws punishing “contempt for gender” (which were exclusively enforced against men).

    Spain has 106 courts set up to punish men (but not women) for domestic violence.

    The last time a nation set up a demographic court to punish one particular demographic was in 1930 when the Nazis set up a system of courts to pass judgment on jews.

    Spanish men (much like American men) are employing the “deadly rattlesnake strategy” when dealing with Spanish women. If you are surrounded by rattlesnakes, the best strategy is to get away from them. Spanish men, as they are in the US, are simply staying away from Spanish women.

    The Spanish government, as in most fascists governments, thinks the best way to force men to have sex with Spanish women is to impose even more government control and regulation on men, and masculinity, to get men to have sex with rattlesnakes. In the meantime, Spain’s net populations growth since the spread of feminism has been, and remains, plummeting.

    With the spread of feminism in Western Europe, Spain’s birthrate and net population growth is plummeting.

    The Spanish government, notwithstanding its “sex czar” has been, and, remains, clueless.

  18. Only about 20% of Danish men are actively in the dating pool.

    Denmark, has fallen ill to a festering infection known as “feminism.” It is the same illness that has taken hold of the rest of Scandanavia, Western Europe and the UK. Because of this gender infirmity, Denmark’s birth rate, and, its population growth, has been plummeting (as is true with most of Western Europe).

    Feminism has given women in Denmark an immunity from civility, and, license to openly hate and ridicule men. For example, it is not uncommon for girls to be sitting on a bus, in a group, and have them openly point to a man and discuss how unattractive he is. The Danish legal system is set up so that once a woman has “been impregnated” by a man, the man is completely disposable in divorce, and, the man’s role as a sperm donor is further degraded by requiring him to pay for the child for the rest of his life so that the impregnated woman may enjoy her fulfillment as a modern feminist.

    Denmark still imposes all of the obligations of men that have survived medieval chivalry, yet, virtually sees men as nothing but completely disposable sperm donors (who are occasionally allowed to work in the Danish socialist job market).

    Denmark’s feminist culture, laws and government view and treat men as nothing but disposable sperm donors.

    The result is that only about 20% of Danish men are actively in the dating pool. Danish women are constantly complaining about not having enough men to satisfy their desires for sexual and social intercourse. Yet, Danish women will viciously guard their feminism, hatred of men, life plans to treat men as disposable, and the concept that men are irrelevant except to give the woman sperm, and, the child some semblance of legitimacy.

    One with intellect, sensitivity, education (instead of the indoctrination that feminism requires) and human dignity might think that the solution to this problem would be to encourage women to learn something about human compassion, respect, human value beyond sex, and, the beauty of binding interpersonal relationships.

    The Danish government doesn’t have any of those problems . . . . Here is the Danish government’s solution. This is just one advertisement of an intense propaganda campaign the Danish feminist government undertook to try to beg men to inseminate Danish women (for “Mom” and for “The State”).

    Spies Rejser is the Danish state travel agency.

    Note how the advertisement features a prominent man-hating feminist in the narrative in order to appease the fascist feminist lobby that controls the country’s social laws and norms.

    Note how the advertisement relegates the man to a mere decoration and accessory and sperm donor.

    Note how the key solution, in the minds of the feminist State, is for women to seduce (and rape (she employs force at the end of the video which would be a serioius crime if a man did it)) the man, as opposed to an honest interaction between two adults seeking mutual love, respect and compassion for each other.

    “Do it for Denmark!”

    The mass media feminist propaganda campaign was an abysmal failure in Denmark. The government remains clueless.


    It’s way, way too late to turn back the tide. It’ll take another century to fix anything.

    Choosing bachelorhood in the face of totalitarian, hypocritical, hyper-gynocentric, man-hating, Chritiano/feminist rule is a necesity for western men.

    Over the past 40+ years, tens upon tens of millions of men’s lives have been destroyed through divorce. Hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of those men, upon realizing that their future was destroyed, committed suicide. How did this happen? Chritiano/feminist divorce.

    As a bread winning man, your wife can cheat on you, cuckold you and then walk away with most of your assets and future income. While she’s off writing the next chapter of her life with the pool boy or bartender, you’ll be forced by law to finance her life goals through alimony and child support – else go to jail.

    Did you know that child support is another form of alimony? Why is that true? Because child support is based on what you make. It goes up exponentially based upon what you earn – and is tax deductible to the recipient (your now deeply hated X wife), not the payer (the man fool who will die homeless).

    Lets be honest men in the west are treated as animals, no reproduction rights, no custody rights, beast of burden of women, war slaves, men are disposable, there is more compasion for dogs than for men. There has been a deep decline in marriage rates over the past several decades, that perfectly aligns with the implementation of Chritiano/feminist divorce.

    In the US, thanks to their dead husbands, fathers and divorce raped X husbands, women now hold the majority of US wealth. Laws are already in place to specifically privilege women over men and to give women easy access to destroy men’s lives (no-fault divorce, Title IX, Yes Means Yes, Affirmative Action, the VAWA, etc). These laws and policies have nothing to do with equality and everything to do with ensuring women’s privilege over men and the redistribution of men’s wealth and power to women.

    The POPE recently made the statement that men need to stop blaming feminism for their problems. THE POPE SAID THIS!

    Know why? For the same reason white knight politicians pander to women for their votes. The last thing you want to do as a man is get married.

    Unfortunately, the majority of women will sit back and watch men be destroyed. Why? Because the denigration of men and the redistribution of wealth from men to women suits them.

    The bonus is – so long as they don’t claim to be feminists – they really had nothing to do with the plight of men. It’s no different than the mass silence of people during the slave days or the mass silence while the Jews were being slaughtered.

    There was an unacknowledged, unspoken gain being had – and those having it weren’t going to rock the boat. Sure – there’s a minority of women out there working for true fairness and equality, but the vast majority of women will sit idly by as men are pushed further and further down the economic and social ladder.

    Now that men are opting out of marriage in record numbers and the birth rate is collapsing in Westernized nations, and men starting to convert to ISLAM, they are afraid. If you want to see the future of the US and all Westernized nations, look to Sweden.

  20. so baby milk and baby food is free and b4 ur child the wife stayed hime while u worked after the child she had to take said child to school and so on housing is more wen u have kids because some landlords charge by the people in said house ,clothing is not free kids watch tv play games in said den most people dont have 2 bedrooms until the child is in the family,this guy has no real clue wat it takes to raise a child including the fact that most ordinary people cant afford child care though i believe child support is doing nothing except harm and break up familys and puts parents in prison or debt they cant recover from in most every case of ordinary people

  21. Everybody has an extra den? Really? Do they have 2 extra dens if there's two different sex children? What about 3 children? And the car, they show how the child easily fits in an empty seat, that stupid little car cannot carry all the kids' crap in the trunk. You need a much bigger car; you need to buy a new car. He doesn't capture that expense. With three children a van is needed. His ideas about food seem pretty weird. He says expenses do not increase children because the parent/s will sacrifice. This is what his argument boils down to: since the parent/s will sacrifice, the actual increase expenditure will not be as great as other estimates. His way does not capture this sacrifice, while the others do. We should capture this sacrifice to determine the TRUE cost of raising a child, not merely the added expense because of the sacrifices of the parents. His study is deeply flawed.

  22. I am a woman with dignity and respect. I am all for supporting and giving children the best life possible. However, I really feel for the people who are sucked into the system (which are often the men). I really hope that these laws change, and that someday I can help do something to contribute in that change once I am knowledgeable enough!

  23. About half of the 25,000 men who commit suicide every year were being persecuted for illegally imposed "child support" … Every lawyer and judge in America needs to be put to death for criminal racketeering under color of law … NOT because I say so … they need to be put to death, because that's what the law requires.

  24. years ago in my child support days. i told my ex back then. I will lose everthing if i pay that much.(car,apt,job) Her answer? ' I dont care" .And Child support services didt give a shit as well.

  25. If you as a man are put on child support, you should refuse to see the child. Its simple: You keep your costs as low as possible you never spend money in court, lawyers, mediators, fees.

    Make money off the books to supplement your income. Keep your costs as low as possible.

    Ultimately we need to make examples of the children, we need to make a child support detterent. The Detterent must be in the form of neglecting their emotional needs. We obviously can't physically assault them because it's criminal… however, you dont have to love them. You dont have to like them. You dont have to feel anything for them and thst should be the repercussion of child support.

    I know it sounds harsh but the state and the women whom have given power and authority to the state have forced your hand. Play the cards you've been dealt and pkay them well.

    Forget the state, forget the women, forget the children.

  26. To say that having a child does not change the amount spent then without any children in the household is complete crap! We all know that children drain your wallet. Child support is necessary to maintain your children's needs and lifestyle prior to the divorce. It's about the kids, NOT the divorced parents. Geesh!

  27. I warned you!!!!!! I have warned everyone i know for over 25 years… But you didnt listen!!!!! I have Written to Congress the Senate and Ex-Presidents. Nobody would do a damn thing about it. Congress woman Nancy Schaefer from Georgia figured it out… Nancy told everyone and then they came to her home and murder her and her loving husband.The CPS Child Protective Service Agencies are port holes to human trafficking obduction kidnapping rape and out right murder by the Worlds Wide Pedophile Empire…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

log in

Become a part of our community!

reset password

Back to
log in